剛在個""號稱""理性獨立思考的社團跟個美國人辯了半天, 下面句型基本上就是每當我引用Wikileaks時會得到的回應:

Jeff Schwartz: sorry but Wikileaks isn't a viable source since it cannot be authenticated. It could just as easily have been doctored. They clearly were trying to sabotage her campaign so why would I believe what they cite without evidence of its authenticity?